Italy Economy Real Time Data Charts

Edward Hugh is only able to update this blog from time to time, but he does run a lively Twitter account with plenty of Italy related comment. He also maintains a collection of constantly updated Italy economy charts together with short text updates on a Storify dedicated page Italy - Lost in Stagnation?

Sunday, June 15, 2008

Italian Inflation May 2008

Italian consumer price inflation accelerated sharply in May to its highest level since August 1996, as energy and food prices continued to surge, final data from statistics office Istat confirmed last Friday. Italian inflation rose 0.5% on a monthly basis and 3.6% on an annual one in May, up from 0.2% and 3.3% respectively in April. While economists had expected a slight jump in CPI growth to 0.3% month-over-month, the consensus had forecast no change from April's annualized increase.

Italian EU harmonized CPI also surprised to the upside. Month-over-month, HICP increased 0.6% in May, up from the 0.4% growth rate expected, but unchanged from April's reading. Annually, HICP rose 3.7%, up from the 3.6% expected

Eurozone inflation accelerated to its highest level in 16 years in May as food and energy costs soared, intensifying what finance ministers from the G7 nations recently described as a "more complicated'' dilemma.

The inflation rate in the euro area rose to 3.7 percent, the highest since June 1992, from 3.3 percent in April, according to eurostat. The rate for May is higher than the 3.6 percent flash estimate published on May 30.

Food-price inflation accelerated to 6.4 percent in May from 6 percent in April, while energy prices rose 13.7 percent from a year earlier, up from a 10.8 percent increase the previous month, according to Eurostat.

Italy's consumer association Federconsumatori has announced that it considers the official rate of inflation given by Istat to be an "underestimate". According to its calculations, in the energy sector alone, forecast increases for a typical family 2008 are 709 euro in direct costs (electricity, gas, heating and fuel) and 546 euro in indirect costs, giving a total of 1,255 euro. They also highlight the rapid increases in the price of food, for which they put a figure of 520 euro. Added to these items are increased costs for insurance services, transport, bank services.

This gives a total increase for all expenditure items of around 2,070 euro, which they calculate would put the rate of inflation for the average family at something like 7 percent. In the light of their findings Federconsumatori are suggesting the Italian Government should rapidly put measures in place to return to families on fixed incomes, be they employees or pensioners, their old level of purchasing power, suggesting an increase of at least 1,200 euro per year.

Not surprisingly such figures going the rounds are causing a lot of debate and consternation, which presumeably is putting considerable pressure on Berlusconi and Tremonti, and hence their somewhat "out of consensus" proposals at the G7 summit this weekend.

Belusconi was arguing for "targeted'' tax cuts on fuels while Finance Minister Giulio Tremonti last week suggested oil companies be forced to pay a "Robin Hood'' tax with the revenues being passed to households. The point is that none of these ideas, either that of the consumer association, or the Italian government suggestions seem to get through to the harsh reality of the situation, which is that this is not a temporary spike in prices but is part of a much longer term process whereby rapid growth in some very populous emerging economies is putting (and will continue to put) systematic strain on what are in capacity terms finite and limited resources. As such living standards in the main OECD countries seem almost certain to fall, at least slightly, as the central banks apply pressure to try and reduce the likelihood of "second round effects" which would only produce a circular inflation perpetuation effect rather than any real alleviation of the problem.

And what Federconsumatori seem to fail to realise is that after many years of the sorry public deficit problem, Italian finances are in no position to bring much in the way of relief to the fixed income groups. This is not a happy situation, but doing something about the deficit years ago might have meant more capacity to react now, but spilt milk is, unfortunately spilt milk, and what has been done has been done.

I have a much more substantial analysis of some of the factors behind the global spike in food prices in this post here.

Update 19 June

The Italian government this morning unveiled a three-year plan in an attempt to revive growth and contain the deficit. The package includes spending cuts and additional taxes on banks and energy companies.

The 2009 budget proposal includes about 8 billion euros ($12 billion) in spending cuts, according to a draft Finance Minister Giulio Tremonti showed to Italy's labour union yesterday. The 13 billion euros of budget adjustments - additional revenue and reduced spending - has as its objective keeping the deficit at 2.5 percent of gross domestic product this year, up from 1.9 percent last year.

In an attempt to boost spending and confidence, Berlusconi's newly elected government passed in May tax cuts on property and overtime pay. To make up for the lost revenue, Tremonti is now raising taxes on oil and financial-services companies. The government also announced it will raise the corporate tax bracket IRES to 33 percent from 27 percent for oil companies, reversing a tax decision made just last year by the previous government of Romano Prodi.

There will be 34 billion euros-worth of adjustments in the next three years, consisting mainly of spending reductions, according to the three-year financial plan, which will serve as a blueprint for next year's budget. The adjustment will be 7.3 billion euros in 2010 and 14.6 billion euros in 2011. It is hoped that this will allow Italy to meet a target to balance its budget by 2011, although of course there are very considerable downsiide risks here, as the spending cuts (at least those which are not balanced by tax reductions like the property tax and overtime pay decisions) will impact negatively on headline growth performance, and this was already looking pretty weak.

No comments: